<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Check Point WAF Customers Protected Against CVE-2026-49975 (HTTP/2 Bomb) in WAF</title>
    <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/WAF/Check-Point-WAF-Customers-Protected-Against-CVE-2026-49975-HTTP/m-p/278374#M409</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Executive Summary&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;A recently disclosed denial-of-service vulnerability, &lt;STRONG&gt;CVE-2026-49975 (HTTP/2 Bomb),&lt;/STRONG&gt; targets HTTP/2 request processing by exploiting the &lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;resource&lt;/FONT&gt; overhead associated with requests containing excessive numbers of HTTP headers. This attack can cause disproportionate CPU and memory consumption and potentially lead to service degradation or denial-of-service conditions in affected environments.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check Point Engineering has assessed the vulnerability across all Check Point WAF deployment models and validated that existing architectural controls provide effective protection.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Technical Overview&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The attack abuses HTTP/2 request processing by sending requests with unusually large numbers of headers, forcing excessive resource allocation on the receiving system.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Environments are most susceptible when:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;HTTP/2 traffic reaches applications directly&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Header count limitations are not enforced&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;Resource consumption scales with header volume&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;No Impact on Check Point WAF Deployments&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT color="#808080"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Check Point WAF SaaS&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check Point WAF SaaS deployments are protected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Customers leveraging integrated CDN capabilities benefit from an additional mitigation layer, as HTTP/2 connections are terminated before traffic reaches the protected application environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL start="2"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT color="#808080"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Check Point WAF Gateway, Unified Container, and Agent Deployments&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For managed Check Point WAF deployments, HTTP/2 traffic is terminated at the WAF layer and is not forwarded directly to protected applications.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As a result, backend applications are not exposed to the vulnerable attack surface described in CVE-2026-49975.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Existing Protection Mechanisms&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check Point WAF already incorporates multiple controls that reduce exposure to HTTP/2 resource exhaustion attacks, including:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Request size limitations&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Header size enforcement&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Layer 7 DDoS protections&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Resource consumption safeguards&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Additional Hardening: Header Count Limiting&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;As an additional defense-in-depth measure, Check Point is introducing a configurable &lt;STRONG&gt;Header Count Limiting&lt;/STRONG&gt; control.This capability allows administrators to define the maximum number of HTTP headers permitted in a single request, helping to:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Prevent excessive header proliferation&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Limit resource consumption per request&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Reduce exposure to HTTP/2 Bomb-style attacks&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Improve resilience against malformed requests&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Example Configuration&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditorVani_2" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Example.png" style="width: 773px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34467i81A8AAFC826AF911/image-dimensions/773x223?v=v2" width="773" height="223" role="button" title="Example.png" alt="Example.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-family: inherit; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Processing Flow&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Process flow.png" style="width: 786px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34468i0A6C71A016C390C8/image-dimensions/786x155?v=v2" width="786" height="155" role="button" title="Process flow.png" alt="Process flow.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Requests exceeding configured thresholds are rejected before reaching the protected application.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Customer Guidance&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No immediate customer action is required for Check Point-managed WAF deployments.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Customers should maintain current releases and apply newly released header-count protection controls when they become available.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Conclusion&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check Point WAF SaaS deployments are protected against CVE-2026-49975 through a combination of architectural design, HTTP/2 termination, request validation, and resource protection controls.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To further strengthen resilience, Check Point is introducing configurable header count limiting, providing an additional safeguard against HTTP/2 resource exhaustion attacks and similar attack techniques.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:52:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vani</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-06-12T10:52:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Check Point WAF Customers Protected Against CVE-2026-49975 (HTTP/2 Bomb)</title>
      <link>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/WAF/Check-Point-WAF-Customers-Protected-Against-CVE-2026-49975-HTTP/m-p/278374#M409</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Executive Summary&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;A recently disclosed denial-of-service vulnerability, &lt;STRONG&gt;CVE-2026-49975 (HTTP/2 Bomb),&lt;/STRONG&gt; targets HTTP/2 request processing by exploiting the &lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;resource&lt;/FONT&gt; overhead associated with requests containing excessive numbers of HTTP headers. This attack can cause disproportionate CPU and memory consumption and potentially lead to service degradation or denial-of-service conditions in affected environments.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check Point Engineering has assessed the vulnerability across all Check Point WAF deployment models and validated that existing architectural controls provide effective protection.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Technical Overview&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The attack abuses HTTP/2 request processing by sending requests with unusually large numbers of headers, forcing excessive resource allocation on the receiving system.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Environments are most susceptible when:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;HTTP/2 traffic reaches applications directly&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Header count limitations are not enforced&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;Resource consumption scales with header volume&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;No Impact on Check Point WAF Deployments&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT color="#808080"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Check Point WAF SaaS&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check Point WAF SaaS deployments are protected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Customers leveraging integrated CDN capabilities benefit from an additional mitigation layer, as HTTP/2 connections are terminated before traffic reaches the protected application environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL start="2"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT color="#808080"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Check Point WAF Gateway, Unified Container, and Agent Deployments&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For managed Check Point WAF deployments, HTTP/2 traffic is terminated at the WAF layer and is not forwarded directly to protected applications.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As a result, backend applications are not exposed to the vulnerable attack surface described in CVE-2026-49975.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Existing Protection Mechanisms&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check Point WAF already incorporates multiple controls that reduce exposure to HTTP/2 resource exhaustion attacks, including:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Request size limitations&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Header size enforcement&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Layer 7 DDoS protections&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Resource consumption safeguards&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Additional Hardening: Header Count Limiting&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;As an additional defense-in-depth measure, Check Point is introducing a configurable &lt;STRONG&gt;Header Count Limiting&lt;/STRONG&gt; control.This capability allows administrators to define the maximum number of HTTP headers permitted in a single request, helping to:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Prevent excessive header proliferation&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Limit resource consumption per request&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Reduce exposure to HTTP/2 Bomb-style attacks&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Improve resilience against malformed requests&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Example Configuration&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditorVani_2" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Example.png" style="width: 773px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34467i81A8AAFC826AF911/image-dimensions/773x223?v=v2" width="773" height="223" role="button" title="Example.png" alt="Example.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-family: inherit; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Processing Flow&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Process flow.png" style="width: 786px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34468i0A6C71A016C390C8/image-dimensions/786x155?v=v2" width="786" height="155" role="button" title="Process flow.png" alt="Process flow.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Requests exceeding configured thresholds are rejected before reaching the protected application.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Customer Guidance&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No immediate customer action is required for Check Point-managed WAF deployments.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Customers should maintain current releases and apply newly released header-count protection controls when they become available.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" color="#800000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Conclusion&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check Point WAF SaaS deployments are protected against CVE-2026-49975 through a combination of architectural design, HTTP/2 termination, request validation, and resource protection controls.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To further strengthen resilience, Check Point is introducing configurable header count limiting, providing an additional safeguard against HTTP/2 resource exhaustion attacks and similar attack techniques.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:52:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/WAF/Check-Point-WAF-Customers-Protected-Against-CVE-2026-49975-HTTP/m-p/278374#M409</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-12T10:52:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

